Physiological and Cognitive Effects of Acute Normobaric Hypoxia and Modulations from Oxygen Breathing

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of normobaric devices for hypoxia awareness training makes crucial the study of physiological and cognitive effects induced by acute normobaric hypoxia (NH) exposure. Our study aimed to 1) investigate the effects of acute NH exposure on physiological variables and working memory; and 2) investigate the physiological and cognitive effects of oxygen breathing before and after acute NH exposure.METHODS: There were 86 healthy men who were randomized into 4 groups: the Normoxia-Air group (N = 23), whose subjects were breathing air; the Hypoxia-Air group (N = 22), where NH exposure was preceded and followed by air breathing; the Normoxia-O₂ group (N = 21), whose protocol was similar to the Normoxia-Air group, except with the addition of 100% O₂ breathing periods; and the Hypoxia-O₂ group (N = 20), whose participants were exposed to 100% O₂ before and after NH exposure. Working memory was assessed with the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. Peripheral oxygen saturation (S_po₂), heart rate (HR), and electroencephalogram (EEG) were recorded.RESULTS: Acute NH exposure induced a classical physiological response (i.e., decreased S_po₂ and increased HR), but not identical to the well-described physiological response to acute hypobaric hypoxia. Acute NH also caused a strong impairment in working memory. Oxygen breathing following NH exposure induced a slowing in the EEG associated with a worsening of working memory performance.DISCUSSION: Acute NH exposure revealed a good surrogate for the classical hypobaric chamber for refresher hypoxia awareness training. Because the association between hypoxia and hyperoxia seems deleterious for the brain, we suggest that NH exposure should be surrounded by air breathing.Malle C, Bourrilhon C, Quinette P, Laisney M, Eustache F, Piérard C. Physiological and cognitive effects of acute normobaric hypoxia and modulations from oxygen breathing. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2016; 87(1):3–12.